US Patriot Missiles For Ukraine Could Literally Trigger WW3; Russia’s Medvedev Warns Of Consequences
In a press conference following the first session of the NATO Foreign Affairs Ministers ’ meeting, a journalist asked General Jens Stoltenberg why the US was unintentional to give Ukraine Patriot air defense systems when it has given the system to othernon-NATO countries.
In his response, the NATO Secretary skirted the question but verified that there’s an ongoing discussion between the US and its NATO abettors on furnishing Ukraine with Patriot systems.Also, on November 9, 2022, answering a intelligencer’s question at a routine press briefing, Pentagon spokesperson Air Force General Patrick Ryder said, “ We’ve no plans to transfer Patriot complexes to Ukraine. ”
evolving on his statement, the General added that furnishing Ukraine with air defense systems is one of the precedences of the US service department. “ We’ll continue to have conversations aboutthis.However, we will do it, ” he added, If we’ve commodity to advertise.The studied ambivalence of US and NATO officers did n’t wisecrack Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation.
Replying to Stoltenberg’s statement, Medvedev wrote a post on his Telegram channel stating, “ If, as( NATO Secretary General Jens) Stoltenberg suggested, NATO inventories Kyiv fanatics with Patriot complexes along with NATO labor force, they will incontinently come a licit target of our fortified forces. ”
Before, German Defense Minister Christine Lambrecht told the Rheinische Post that Germany was ready to supply Patriot batteries to Poland to defend against bullet attacks from Ukrainian airspace.Strangely, her Polish coworker Mariusz Blaszczak suggested that Germany rather supply the batteries to Ukraine.( Poland has formerly ordered an advanced variant of the Patriot system that combines the capabilities of Israel’s David’s Sling program with Patriot PAC- 3 radars).
The German defense minister dismissed the Polish suggestion saying that placing Patriot batteries in Ukraine would bear close consultations with NATO mates.Reasons For Western Hesitancy & Medvedev’s trouble
easily, there’s commodity about the Patriot system that makes the US and some NATO countries cautious of handing it over to Ukraine. But also, why are they considering the option?Also, why is Medvedev warning of escalation?The M- 104 Patriot is a mobile medium- range face- to- air bullet system able of engaging aircraft, ballistic dumdums, and drones. It’s the primary announcement bullet system of the US Army and several NATO countries.
The system has also been vended tonon-NATO countries similar as Israel, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Japan, Morocco, Qatar, UAE, Taiwan,etc.The Patriot bullet system features advanced technology subsystems similar as a single PESA/ AESA radar that’s able of tracking multiple targets while at the same time guiding interceptors dumdums to the target.
In utmost announcement systems, the functionality is divided between two radars – one for shadowing and the other for bullet guidance. The loyalist interceptor bullet itself features active homing, with variants featuring active and unresistant homing.The maximum range of the system is 70 km. The PAC- 2 variant is suitable to block targets up to an altitude of 20 km(,000 ft) and the PAC- 3 up to 40 km(,000 ft).
Unlike Russian bullet systems similar as the S- 300, S- 350, S- 400, and S- 500, which use multiple types of dumdums, with each type honed to engage a different type of target, the Patriot systems use a single type of interceptor bullet for drones, aircraft, and ballistic dumdums.What that means is if the Patriot interceptor fired at a drone at 200 ft altitude were to go amiss, it could well hit a US/ NATO upstanding asset flying at,000ft., furnishing intelligence or aircover to Ukrainian forces.
In discrepancy, the bullet fired by S- 400 to engage a drone would not have the capability to engage a high- flying target.As per open source intelligence, the final engagement authority for Patriot units rests with the Regional or Sector Air Defense Commander( RADC/ SADC), who’s located moreover on aU.S. Navy guided bullet sportfisherman or on a USAF AWACS aircraft.
It’s likely that the Pentagon’s guarded response to the Ukrainian request for Patriot systems and Medvedev’s statements have commodity to do with the imperative to keep a US Commander in the circlhat Medvedev inferred in his statement was that the US commander sitting in the AWAC overseeing Ukrainian Patriot engagements would be fair game for the Russian fighter- launched RVV- BD air- to- air( A2A) bullet or S- 400 system- launched 40N6E bullet.
The Patriot’s capability to engage ballistic dumdums also is doubtful to be taken smoothly by Russian military leaders. Stationed in large figures in Ukraine, Patriot systems could veritably effectively fight any ballistic dumdums that Russia may land from Iran in the future to attack Ukrainian structure.
Iranian- origin dumdums similar as the 300- km range Fateh- 110 and the 700 km range Zolfaghar follow a simple ballistic line and would be an easy game for the Patriot interceptor, unlike Russian ballistic dumdums like the Iskander which maneuver to avoid interception.Russia is doubtful to keep ceding its options to avoid a direct clash with NATO, while NATO keeps pushing it ever harder into a corner.